laserfan
04-11-2005, 08:49 AM
I found a contradiction in the Vehicle Service Contract that we bought, and called Honda on it. The customer service rep said, "oh, it's a mistake, don't worry about it" but when I pressed about "will it be corrected" he gave me to Contracts department. They seemed completely flustered that their lawyers might have made a mistake (!horrors, they're paid to get this stuff right!) but I have yet to hear back from them on what their position is on it. The apparent contradiction:
Both the Application (w/Example contract) and the Vehicle Service Contract booklet state (VSC page 2) under A. PARTS that FUEL SYSTEM is covered.
But then on page 4 of the VSC, section IV. WHAT IS NOT COVERED, first para A you will find listed as NOT COVERED the very same words, "fuel system".
I cannot find a way to read this as anything but a direct contradiction, and of course the Fuel System would include some very serious stuff like the tank, the neck, the fuel pump, perhaps injectors, etc.
I don't really doubt that if the fuel pump broke, my dealer would fix it, but if I'm right about the contradiction it causes me to wonder what else Honda got wrong about the contract. :eek:
Both the Application (w/Example contract) and the Vehicle Service Contract booklet state (VSC page 2) under A. PARTS that FUEL SYSTEM is covered.
But then on page 4 of the VSC, section IV. WHAT IS NOT COVERED, first para A you will find listed as NOT COVERED the very same words, "fuel system".
I cannot find a way to read this as anything but a direct contradiction, and of course the Fuel System would include some very serious stuff like the tank, the neck, the fuel pump, perhaps injectors, etc.
I don't really doubt that if the fuel pump broke, my dealer would fix it, but if I'm right about the contradiction it causes me to wonder what else Honda got wrong about the contract. :eek: