Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner

2012 Strake on 09-11 Ridgelines?

15538 Views 65 Replies 25 Participants Last post by  ebrit003
Some of you will have noticed that the front lower part of the 2012 RLs have a strake (See Picture 1, originally posted by jonesbb630 here).

This little piece of plastic is supposed to increase gas mileage by 1 MPG.

This be applied to the 09-11s.

For those interested, you will need to following 2012 RL parts.
74102-SJC-A50 STRAKE, R. FR. ~$1.16
74152-SJC-A50 STRAKE, L. FR. ~$1.16
90101-S3V-A00 BOLT-WASHER (6X26) - X 12 (6 per side) - ~1.13 each
74111-SJC-A50 SHIELD, FR. SPLASH ~$45
74101-SJC-A50 FENDER, R. FR. (INNER) ~45
74151-SJC-A50 FENDER, L. FR. (INNER) ~45

Instructions are attached as images.

Notes:
I modified the install and did it without swapping out the fender inner pieces.
See here for my install and here for differences in MPG.

Attachments

See less See more
5
1 - 20 of 66 Posts
Interesting post. Another MPG would work for me. Think about it though, at 20mpg's average, that piece of plastic would increase mileage by 5%.

Sounds good to me! Thanks for taking the time to put this together. Well done..
Has Honda said this one cent piece of plastic is the sole reason for the slight bump in MPG? I thought they are also claiming they made other changes to the 2012 which helped get the highway number up one MPG? Adding the "strake" probably can't hurt, at least.
I think it is a combination of a few things. But no 1 mpg without the front flap. That seems to be the obvious change. Not sure I want the plastic even it did promise me 1 mpg...let's just say I would not be chawin' at the bit to get one.
6 bolts per side...WOW!...Honda doesn't want those $1.16 strakes falling off!

Still, they aren't too obtrusive and the ROI would be short even if they saved 0.25 mpg on the highway.

Plus, I always like an excuse to get the 19.2 volt Craftsman out...
Looks like the perfect thing to have to replace after driving through deep snow. But I agree, a small investment if it could potentially save mpg.

IMHO - I bet I'd get better mpg just by removing my roof rack and running boards.
Looks like the perfect thing to have to replace after driving through deep snow. But I agree, a small investment if it could potentially save mpg.

IMHO - I bet I'd get better mpg just by removing my roof rack and running boards.
Roof racks are the detriment to mpg but more so if you leave the cross bars on when not in use (I know removing them on the RL can be a bit of a pain vs some other manufacturers designs)...I've seen documentation on hwy mpg effect of anywhere from 1-2 mpg less with the cross bars installed (plus the potential for wind noise and whistle)...

I don't think the running boards or steps have much effect (ESPECIALLY if you put on the strakes and deflect the air around them!)
Roof racks are the detriment to mpg but more so if you leave the cross bars on when not in use (I know removing them on the RL can be a bit of a pain vs some other manufacturers designs)...I've seen documentation on hwy mpg effect of anywhere from 1-2 mpg less with the cross bars installed (plus the potential for wind noise and whistle)...

I don't think the running boards or steps have much effect (ESPECIALLY if you put on the strakes and deflect the air around them!)
The whistle and wind noise are largely due to improper installation.
Maybe make some out of clear vinyl so they are less visible.
I have a roof rack, threw it on about 6 months later after I bought the RL, I don't know what wind noise or whistle you all are referring to. I would have to drive with the radio off, and windows down to even hear anything from topside. Who drives in complete silence?? Also mpg loss?? My mpg never decreased after putting it on. Where are all these scientific claims originating from??
There are a lot of semi-scientific experiments like below:

http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/family/roof-rack-affect-mgp.htm

http://move.rmi.org/move-news/getting-better-gas-mileage-by-reducing-air-drag.html

I agree that noise isn't a given...I had a roof rack on my RL for a short period but simply didn't need it, so sold it to another ROC member that did...I had no noise issues (noise usually start when the bike, etc goes on the rack).

I think on a vehicle like the RL, that already doesn't have the lowest drag coefficient, that the impact would be pretty minor...even difficult to measure any real effect...but increased drag is simply a scientific fact in the case of anything on the roof of a car or truck...
I'm waiting to see the 2012 Ridge fuel numbers, then maybe I will add them to mine.
Roof racks are the detriment to mpg but more so if you leave the cross bars on when not in use (I know removing them on the RL can be a bit of a pain vs some other manufacturers designs)...I've seen documentation on hwy mpg effect of anywhere from 1-2 mpg less with the cross bars installed (plus the potential for wind noise and whistle)...

I don't think the running boards or steps have much effect (ESPECIALLY if you put on the strakes and deflect the air around them!)
You should see how a refrigerator drops the mpg... We went 16 miles and dropped from 22.9 to 20.8 according to the mileage meter.
You should see how a refrigerator drops the mpg... We went 16 miles and dropped from 22.9 to 20.8 according to the mileage meter.
Strangely enough, one of the worst mileage trips I ever had was with a 4-up bike rack plugged into the receiver (with 3 bikes on it). It was like a parachute for some reason...We dropped from 22.8 mpg on the previous cottage trip with a similar weight/passenger load to about 18.5 mpg with the stupid bikes.

Worst even than with an ATV looming over the cab on the next run (think we still got a little over 20 mpg). Air flow can get messed up in a lot of different ways I guess...
Strangely enough, one of the worst mileage trips I ever had was with a 4-up bike rack plugged into the receiver (with 3 bikes on it). It was like a parachute for some reason...We dropped from 22.8 mpg on the previous cottage trip with a similar weight/passenger load to about 18.5 mpg with the stupid bikes.

Worst even than with an ATV looming over the cab on the next run (think we still got a little over 20 mpg). Air flow can get messed up in a lot of different ways I guess...
Wow, you wouldn't think your rack with 3 bikes would produce that much wind resistance.
Ive never gotten over 20 mpg no matter what' so im jealous
Strangely enough, one of the worst mileage trips I ever had was with a 4-up bike rack plugged into the receiver (with 3 bikes on it). It was like a parachute for some reason...We dropped from 22.8 mpg on the previous cottage trip with a similar weight/passenger load to about 18.5 mpg with the stupid bikes.

Worst even than with an ATV looming over the cab on the next run (think we still got a little over 20 mpg). Air flow can get messed up in a lot of different ways I guess...
Due to disturbing the way the air rolls off the tailgate. Same reason you don't want to add a rear spoiler.
Strangely enough, one of the worst mileage trips I ever had was with a 4-up bike rack plugged into the receiver (with 3 bikes on it). It was like a parachute for some reason...We dropped from 22.8 mpg on the previous cottage trip with a similar weight/passenger load to about 18.5 mpg with the stupid bikes.

Worst even than with an ATV looming over the cab on the next run (think we still got a little over 20 mpg). Air flow can get messed up in a lot of different ways I guess...
That's interesting.
I doubt it will make a measurable difference. For EPA testing, if the RL scores 20.9, Honda can only advertize 20mpg. If they stick on a piece of plastic that pushes it a hair over 21, they can claim 21mpg.
I doubt it will make a measurable difference. For EPA testing, if the RL scores 20.9, Honda can only advertize 20mpg. If they stick on a piece of plastic that pushes it a hair over 21, they can claim 21mpg.
This little piece of plastic is supposed to increase gas mileage by 1 MPG.
OK, let’s say reality is midway between GT’s glass half-empty attitude of negligible MPG improvement and JS’s optimistic claim of 1 MPG improvement, that means that a ½ mpg improvement is possible with the strake thingies installed. They don't cost that much, and I think they look no worse than many other exterior accessories, so I’m willing to give them a chance to perform. Now, all I have to do is figure out how to bolt them on to an ’07 splash shield.
1 - 20 of 66 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top