Joined
·
9,975 Posts
Look a midsize pickup with a real armrest!!
Attachments
-
191.5 KB Views: 313
-
24.9 KB Views: 273
What I saw was an option between a 4 cyl gas and 5 cyl diesel. Ford has the 2.7 turbo that they are putting in F-150's that could go in the Ranger. I had a 94 Ranger, good truck.And from what I've read a possibility for some sort of diesel
bring it on! ?oh damn. That could be my next truck. Looks like several companies are going to step up to the plate in the mid-size truck market. Swing batter, batter.
Good catch. Sounding even better now.I think I see unibody as well.....if it was on frame that body would be twisted...
I agree, it does look a bit Tacoma-ish. Which is ok with me because I like the look of the new Tacoma but I don't like some of the issues the new Tacoma is having.I like the looks of that Ranger. But it does look a bit Toyota-ish to me. (which is not a bad thing). I think it looks better than the Taco. And the G2 RL too. However, initial impressions can be deceiving.
Ridgedawg, my thoughts exactly, looked at some other midsize trucks and so far the twins are a possibility, and when this new Ranger hits the market I will definitely look at that. I guess I'm narrowing it down to 3 so far, one of the twins, aDodge Ram1500, or this Ranger.After finally seeing the G2 in person I don't think I could possibly allow myself to spend $40,000 on one. As much as I absolutely can't believe I'm going to say this, I think I'd buy one of the GM twins first. Luckily it'll be a few years before I need to worry about it.
What I might consider doing is trading for a low mileage 2014 RL SE if I can find one from the south. But this Ranger will certainly be on the list.