Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner

CR recommends the Ridgeline

4310 Views 11 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  stevem5215
Consumer Reports ranked the 2017 Ridgeline the highest midsize pickup and gave it their 'Recommended' rating.

On the other end, the Tacoma was last in the ratings. They produced this short video of vehicles to avoid.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAkfiVkBP_Q They highlight the poor reliability, stiff ride, clumsy handling, loud, and only average owner satisfaction.

The Tacomaworld forum is circling the wagons over this. https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads/2017-tacoma-and-consumer-reports.481086/

After driving the same F150 for years, I really, really wanted to like the Tacoma. I knew I wanted to downsize, and it was almost a no-brainer to get the Toyota. But then I drove one. :(
  • Like
Reactions: 5
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
I hate how fans blindly follow and defend the defenseless. Why fight when something when it is a proven fact? They are loud, slow, rough riding and not dependable. It is not a child. If it was your kid, I can understand...sure they are loud and rough and not dependable, but hey, they are MY KIDS!
See what I mean?
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I use CR as a data point because they tend to complain about stuff that doesn't matter to me. Can't take them too seriously. For example when the 2015 CRV came out they said that the handling was worse than the previoius generation. I own both and yes, CR is correct but IMO not enough of a difference to have a "gripe."

Everyone was waiting for the new Taco to come out and when it did the only thing that I remember was a review in one of the magazines saying that Toyota wasn't fooling anyone because the new truck was similar to the old one. Reliability data is helpful but right now all the products are within a year or two from inception so I wouldn't place too much stock in predicted reliability. Remember, it's the small pickup class CR is commenting on so who is there to compare to, the RL and Colorado? Is there even enough data for the RL yet since so few have been produced?

Remember that the E and BE are the ones that are liked by the reviewers because of the combined safety rating with the LED headlights. So for all of us lesser trim owners it's nice to think that we have the greatest but we don't.

It seems like quality continues to slip across manufacturers so today there are no guarantees even with Honda. Yesterday, I passed by the local Honda dealer and noticed many used F-150's. I looked it up and they had 15. What's up with that? By the way, this dealer has 25 RL's inventory seems to have stabilized.
See less See more
... Yesterday, I passed by the local Honda dealer and noticed many used F-150's. I looked it up and they had 15. What's up with that? By the way, this dealer has 25 RL's inventory seems to have stabilized.
they traded them in to get the new G2!
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I used to have a 2013 Taco TRD Sport as my daily commuter & hobby hauler. I turned it in a bit more than a year ago when the lease was up. Just to be sure, I test drove the 2016 immediately before settling on the 2017 RL. For my particular set of missions, it wasn't even close. Driving the Taco convinced me the RL was a no-brainer.

What the Taco has going for it is (or at least was) a very high residual. I.e., cheap leases. And dedicated enthusiasts, which is fine too. And it's well adapted for true off-roading. But for those of us on pavement 99.x percent of the time who need to take the occasional conference call in traffic, it is RL all the way.

And I freaking love that trunk. Not just for grocery getting, but also a secure place to stash my laptop bag if I need to run an errand before or after work.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I use CR as a data point because they tend to complain about stuff that doesn't matter to me. Can't take them too seriously. For example when the 2015 CRV came out they said that the handling was worse than the previoius generation. I own both and yes, CR is correct but IMO not enough of a difference to have a "gripe."

Everyone was waiting for the new Taco to come out and when it did the only thing that I remember was a review in one of the magazines saying that Toyota wasn't fooling anyone because the new truck was similar to the old one. Reliability data is helpful but right now all the products are within a year or two from inception so I wouldn't place too much stock in predicted reliability. Remember, it's the small pickup class CR is commenting on so who is there to compare to, the RL and Colorado? Is there even enough data for the RL yet since so few have been produced?

Remember that the E and BE are the ones that are liked by the reviewers because of the combined safety rating with the LED headlights. So for all of us lesser trim owners it's nice to think that we have the greatest but we don't.

It seems like quality continues to slip across manufacturers so today there are no guarantees even with Honda. Yesterday, I passed by the local Honda dealer and noticed many used F-150's. I looked it up and they had 15. What's up with that? By the way, this dealer has 25 RL's inventory seems to have stabilized.
I use all reviews - no matter the source - only as data points. CR, the car & truck magazines, etc. all look at things from a particular viewpoint. The car magazines tend towards the enthusiast point of view that doesn't fit everybody else's needs. In the end only one review matters to me - mine after the research & test drives are done.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Tacomas are great for off-roading. They suck at most everything else.

I appreciate them for what they are, but I have no interest in one.
Any CR review needs to be taken with a grain of salt, just like reviews from any other source. In my opinion CR is most useful if you are looking for a reliable and relatively cheap used car. Their new vehicle reviews and ratings are just "ok".
Tacomas are great for off-roading. They suck at most everything else.

I appreciate them for what they are, but I have no interest in one.
When I first started think about my next truck, in about 2009, I always contemplated it would be a Tacoma since I was only interested in the small(er) truck market, would never buy the Nissan and was unsure of the GM 5 cylinder engines. In 2011 I walked into the Toyota dealership ready to buy, but the salesman I ran into was such a dick I decided to check out what Honda had up the road. I'm glad I did. The Ridgeline wasn't even on my radar prior to that.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It was the dealer that killed my deal for the Taco. Salesman outright sucked! Tried to sell me a truck for $1500 more than it was listed for on THEIR site! And I had bought(Taco) from them before. :frown: Tom
by the way, this dealer has 25 rl's inventory seems to have stabilized.
who has 25 rl's in stock????
There is a dealer in New Jersey with 35 on the lot.

Steve
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top