I have a big bag of mixed feelings on these "helpers".
Intuitively, I truly believe the general driving population will become WORSE drivers, given their comfort/confidence in the presence of a crutch to keep them out of trouble; be this a conscious or subconscious condition.
BUT, I also recognize that SOME of these features are just as valuable as the advent of airbags (don't go there) or seat belts. The frontal collision avoidance schemes for instance (brake automatically).
AND, if the entire control of the car were managed by a near zero-fault system, and it were in ALL vehicles, I'd be fine with it.
BUT, any random scattering of various tech features that potentially instill false confidence in drivers, and that vary from vehicle to vehicle is NOT a good recipe for improved safety on our roads, IMO.
Think about those drivers that fall into that lull of no-worries, now driving a vehicle, not their own..... and without those features.
Think also about the victims of those drivers; drivers who feel shielded by their car's ability to shield THEM from danger, but who now don't pay enough attention to keep from creating road-havoc for the OTHER guy.
'Just makes me uncomfortable that the standards for the DRIVER are not being focused on; because until ALL vehicles are equipped with a LOT more automated safety systems than are presently available, it's all a crap shoot as to who benefits & who suffers.
Not a fan of the celebratory acceptance of these "nanny" features, as they have been so appropriately tagged. Heaven help us if we don't escape this "tween" zone of "automated driving features" fairly quickly. Defensive driving was never so important as it has become lately, and as I fear will become even more essential as we move forward into this new era of "my car will take care of me" mentality (while face is in phone).
Just one opinion.....
Intuitively, I truly believe the general driving population will become WORSE drivers, given their comfort/confidence in the presence of a crutch to keep them out of trouble; be this a conscious or subconscious condition.
BUT, I also recognize that SOME of these features are just as valuable as the advent of airbags (don't go there) or seat belts. The frontal collision avoidance schemes for instance (brake automatically).
AND, if the entire control of the car were managed by a near zero-fault system, and it were in ALL vehicles, I'd be fine with it.
BUT, any random scattering of various tech features that potentially instill false confidence in drivers, and that vary from vehicle to vehicle is NOT a good recipe for improved safety on our roads, IMO.
Think about those drivers that fall into that lull of no-worries, now driving a vehicle, not their own..... and without those features.
Think also about the victims of those drivers; drivers who feel shielded by their car's ability to shield THEM from danger, but who now don't pay enough attention to keep from creating road-havoc for the OTHER guy.
'Just makes me uncomfortable that the standards for the DRIVER are not being focused on; because until ALL vehicles are equipped with a LOT more automated safety systems than are presently available, it's all a crap shoot as to who benefits & who suffers.
Not a fan of the celebratory acceptance of these "nanny" features, as they have been so appropriately tagged. Heaven help us if we don't escape this "tween" zone of "automated driving features" fairly quickly. Defensive driving was never so important as it has become lately, and as I fear will become even more essential as we move forward into this new era of "my car will take care of me" mentality (while face is in phone).
Just one opinion.....