Joined
·
24,886 Posts
I spent the evening after work crawling in and around a few G2s at a local dealer. They had 5 in stock and there were 2-3 people looking at and test driving each one, so I had to wait a while for my test drive while I looked over other models.
My initial impressions were...
1. Definitely looks and feels smaller than the G1 - the exterior more so than the interior.
2. Wow - there is absolutely no question that the opening angle of the rear doors is more limited than it should be. This wasn't even on my mind when I first opened the rear door. In fact, I thought something was wrong before realizing what others have said about the opening angle. Larger people may need to plan their ingress and egress carefully. This is going to be a problem not only for some people, but for a lot of cargo.
3. Fit and finish seemed acceptable - much better than my 2014.
4. Yup - the trunk is even smaller and the bed is shallower than I had imagined. It's much easier to reach over into the bed, though.
Now on to the test drive...
5. The engine started with a light, easy, quick, and refined sound - definitely a more "upscale" starting feel.
5.5. Steering - less effort required than the G1. I like "easy", over-boosted steering so you can spin the wheel with your pinky. It's not near that light, but it's definitely easier, smoother, and more consistent - an advantage of electric power steering over hydraulic. The steering wheel came across as being a bit too large. I like itty-bitty steering wheels like the 2016 Civic has. I don't know why - I just do.
6. Throttle tip-in: It takes a lot of firm, intentional pedal movement to accelerate. A pedal with lighter resistance would give the impression of more power.
7. Despite weighing slightly less than the G1, it felt much heavier - not necessarily in a bad way, but in a way that imparts a sense of substance, refinement, safety, and luxury.
8. The ride was luxury-car smooth. Very impressed here.
9. On smooth pavement, it was impressively quiet - easily the quietest Honda yet. On coarse, rough pavement, it was a bit noisier than I had hoped for and expected, but still a definitely improvement over the G1.
10. Despite having 30 more horsepower, the truck didn't feel noticeably quicker than the G1. Perhaps my expectations were too high and I'm sure an instrumented test will confirm, but I'd guess around 7-7.5 seconds 0-60 - a bit faster than the G1, but slower than the 6.x range estimated by Car & Driver.
10.5 Transmission - while it shifts smoother than the G1's 5AT, another two or three gear ratios would be a welcomed addition. It certainly serves its purpose, but a few more gears would really kick the whole vehicle up a notch to the next level of performance, efficiency, and refinement. Some may be wise to wait for the 10AT since the 6AT comes across as a limited-effort in an otherwise impressive powertrain.
11. Braking felt very natural. The pedal was easy to modulate for both quick stopping and light braking - still not as reassuring as it could be, but a noticeable improvement over the G1.
11.5 Honda Sensing - I'm familiar with the features in this package on my CR-V. There was something wrong with the Ridgeline's steering - it kept beeping and shaking the steering wheel even though I was centered in my lane. My CR-V has never done this. I've read stories of Honda Sensing features going crazy. The only real issue I have with those features on my CR-V is it will sometimes unexpectedly and suddenly grind to a halt if I'm too close behind someone who is turning into a parking lot or if someone cuts me off - the car overreacts and slows down unnecessarily - and sometimes dangerously.
12. Those armrests. Oh, those "ratchet" (pun intended) armrests. Honda, why has thou forsaken me? I stated this would be a deal-breaker months ago. I hate them in the Pilot. I hate them in the Ridgeline. They are unnatural and uncomfortable to me.
13. The touch screen is as much of a glare hazard and fingerprint magnet as has been complained about. Shame on you, Honda.
14. The in-cab audio system sounded...okay. Certainly better than the G1, but not as good as I had hoped. Based on specifications, I had high expectations, but I was somewhat disappointed.
15. The in-bed audio was...well... Given the technology and design, I had very low expectations of sound quality, so I wasn't surprised with the way it sounded.
Back at the dealership...
16. The "frontal plastics" were nearly touching the parking lot curb. One encounter with a higher-than-average curb or parking stop is going to ruin someone's day.
17. The rear seating area felt very familiar coming from a G1 - lots of "cut and paste" went on here, but that's okay. I never really had a problem with the G1 in this area.
18. The interior needs a some more luxury touches to match the price range and car- or SUV-like aura. Perhaps some fake woodgrain trim or brushed aluminum or more chrome. As it is, it still came across as somewhat monotone and plain - again, better than the G1, but not quite as visually appealing as I would prefer.
So, my final verdict?
There's no question it is a different vehicle than the G1 Ridgeline. Those wanting more truck-like capability will be disappointed. Those wanting more car-like comfort and features will be impressed. It has some flaws which will vary from insignificant to major depending on your needs, but so did the G1 - there's no perfect vehicle.
Based on my initial impressions and my test drive, I'm interested in buying one at this point, BUT... It's going to take a significant discount off MSRP to offset my dislike for the armrests.
My initial impressions were...
1. Definitely looks and feels smaller than the G1 - the exterior more so than the interior.
2. Wow - there is absolutely no question that the opening angle of the rear doors is more limited than it should be. This wasn't even on my mind when I first opened the rear door. In fact, I thought something was wrong before realizing what others have said about the opening angle. Larger people may need to plan their ingress and egress carefully. This is going to be a problem not only for some people, but for a lot of cargo.
3. Fit and finish seemed acceptable - much better than my 2014.
4. Yup - the trunk is even smaller and the bed is shallower than I had imagined. It's much easier to reach over into the bed, though.
Now on to the test drive...
5. The engine started with a light, easy, quick, and refined sound - definitely a more "upscale" starting feel.
5.5. Steering - less effort required than the G1. I like "easy", over-boosted steering so you can spin the wheel with your pinky. It's not near that light, but it's definitely easier, smoother, and more consistent - an advantage of electric power steering over hydraulic. The steering wheel came across as being a bit too large. I like itty-bitty steering wheels like the 2016 Civic has. I don't know why - I just do.
6. Throttle tip-in: It takes a lot of firm, intentional pedal movement to accelerate. A pedal with lighter resistance would give the impression of more power.
7. Despite weighing slightly less than the G1, it felt much heavier - not necessarily in a bad way, but in a way that imparts a sense of substance, refinement, safety, and luxury.
8. The ride was luxury-car smooth. Very impressed here.
9. On smooth pavement, it was impressively quiet - easily the quietest Honda yet. On coarse, rough pavement, it was a bit noisier than I had hoped for and expected, but still a definitely improvement over the G1.
10. Despite having 30 more horsepower, the truck didn't feel noticeably quicker than the G1. Perhaps my expectations were too high and I'm sure an instrumented test will confirm, but I'd guess around 7-7.5 seconds 0-60 - a bit faster than the G1, but slower than the 6.x range estimated by Car & Driver.
10.5 Transmission - while it shifts smoother than the G1's 5AT, another two or three gear ratios would be a welcomed addition. It certainly serves its purpose, but a few more gears would really kick the whole vehicle up a notch to the next level of performance, efficiency, and refinement. Some may be wise to wait for the 10AT since the 6AT comes across as a limited-effort in an otherwise impressive powertrain.
11. Braking felt very natural. The pedal was easy to modulate for both quick stopping and light braking - still not as reassuring as it could be, but a noticeable improvement over the G1.
11.5 Honda Sensing - I'm familiar with the features in this package on my CR-V. There was something wrong with the Ridgeline's steering - it kept beeping and shaking the steering wheel even though I was centered in my lane. My CR-V has never done this. I've read stories of Honda Sensing features going crazy. The only real issue I have with those features on my CR-V is it will sometimes unexpectedly and suddenly grind to a halt if I'm too close behind someone who is turning into a parking lot or if someone cuts me off - the car overreacts and slows down unnecessarily - and sometimes dangerously.
12. Those armrests. Oh, those "ratchet" (pun intended) armrests. Honda, why has thou forsaken me? I stated this would be a deal-breaker months ago. I hate them in the Pilot. I hate them in the Ridgeline. They are unnatural and uncomfortable to me.
13. The touch screen is as much of a glare hazard and fingerprint magnet as has been complained about. Shame on you, Honda.
14. The in-cab audio system sounded...okay. Certainly better than the G1, but not as good as I had hoped. Based on specifications, I had high expectations, but I was somewhat disappointed.
15. The in-bed audio was...well... Given the technology and design, I had very low expectations of sound quality, so I wasn't surprised with the way it sounded.
Back at the dealership...
16. The "frontal plastics" were nearly touching the parking lot curb. One encounter with a higher-than-average curb or parking stop is going to ruin someone's day.
17. The rear seating area felt very familiar coming from a G1 - lots of "cut and paste" went on here, but that's okay. I never really had a problem with the G1 in this area.
18. The interior needs a some more luxury touches to match the price range and car- or SUV-like aura. Perhaps some fake woodgrain trim or brushed aluminum or more chrome. As it is, it still came across as somewhat monotone and plain - again, better than the G1, but not quite as visually appealing as I would prefer.
So, my final verdict?
There's no question it is a different vehicle than the G1 Ridgeline. Those wanting more truck-like capability will be disappointed. Those wanting more car-like comfort and features will be impressed. It has some flaws which will vary from insignificant to major depending on your needs, but so did the G1 - there's no perfect vehicle.
Based on my initial impressions and my test drive, I'm interested in buying one at this point, BUT... It's going to take a significant discount off MSRP to offset my dislike for the armrests.