I totally agree. I have no use for the big bloated beasts today's trucks have become. I love my Hondameno.
holy crap thats funny. They should sell a grate to cover the tail pipe to keep out the critters.I live in a very truck rich area in CT. Some of these trucks are jacked up high enought to almost need a ladder to get into. The diesel guys have exhaust system so large that a woodchuck could live in the tail pipes. Some have aftermarket turbo systems with enough psi to blow over street signs at fifty yards. Their 'Jake brakes' and compression releif valves can scare def folks to death with all the noise these machines produce. It goes without saying that a ton of money went into these things. Some owners like to go mudding (probabbly a ton of fun :smileand as a badge of courage leave as much mud on their trucks for as long as they can.
What I'm trying to say is these super duty vehicles, often refered to as 'Broodozzers', have become today's younger mans sports car. It's a rare sight to see any of them doing any truck like duties with their [truck] aftermarket show cases. I'm still not quite sure why 'Broodozzers' seem to be chick magnets?
I've had my share of soild axel trucks (all 4x4) that I typically bought to use for garden work, light duty hauling, our once weekly dump run or just getting around in if it snows. The new Ridgeline [for me] is the perfect vehicle for what I need from a truck and lets me ride comfortably in quiet when it's not being used as a truck.
I'm surprized that so many truck buyers these days still think they need huge body on frame, solid axel, full sized trucks to do all the things - that they probabbly will never do?
Yeah, that's so you can't stuff a potato or banana in it. But you could get them during watermelon season 0holy crap thats funny. They should sell a grate to cover the tail pipe to keep out the critters.
Agreed, a CRV type of vehicle hits the sweet spot but is a little boring. RL could be overkill but the same argument could be said for Pilot vs. CRV, Explorer vs. Escape, etc. You have to draw the line somewhere on where the minimum threshold is. Of all the trucks out there, the RL is at the lower end size wise.Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.
I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).
Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.
I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).
Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
I find the RLs to be the perfect blend for my needs. I drive 125 out to the ranch in amazing comfort, excellent handling and decent gas milage with tools and gear loaded in the bed, then drive 1 mile on caliche/gravel roads to camp. No concerns with gas vapors from gas cans since they are in the bed and no guilt hauling a deer etc back home in the bed. It also fits in the garage better than the "big boys".Agreed, a CRV type of vehicle hits the sweet spot but is a little boring. RL could be overkill but the same argument could be said for Pilot vs. CRV, Explorer vs. Escape, etc. You have to draw the line somewhere on where the minimum threshold is. Of all the trucks out there, the RL is at the lower end size wise.
It's not belittling big trucks at all. The folks in in the crosshairs are those with the overdeveloped peacock gene who take said truck (or tuner car or whatever else) and pour so many bucks into customizing it that the vehicle becomes less and less practical at what it was meant to do.Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.
I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).
Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
Not too much has changed over the years. It's kinda like 'lake pipes' on the lowered (we now say 'slammed) 1948 Mercury lead sleds that were cool in the 50s. Custom cars like that were a symbol of rebeliousness back in the day (James Dean 'Reble without a cause') but don't drive that old Merc over a pencil sized twig or attempt turning up a driveway. Like many of the monster trucks we see these days the word useful/practical would not be an adjective used to discribe those creations.It's not belittling big trucks at all. The folks in in the crosshairs are those with the overdeveloped peacock gene who take said truck (or tuner car or whatever else) and pour so many bucks into customizing it that the vehicle becomes less and less practical at what it was meant to do.
Look at the folks who run smokestacks in the bed so they can drive down the road pumping black smoke and screaming look at me. They're trading useful cargo area for the opportunity to be a clown car in their own personal parade.
Agreed, a CRV type of vehicle hits the sweet spot but is a little boring. RL could be overkill but the same argument could be said for Pilot vs. CRV, Explorer vs. Escape, etc. You have to draw the line somewhere on where the minimum threshold is. Of all the trucks out there, the RL is at the lower end size wise.
Wéve got the full spectrum covered with a G2 CRV, G1 Pilot, and G1 Ridgeline. I've only had the RL for 3-4 weeks now, but so far it's getting better mpg than the Pilot. The CRV is a bit better, but not tremendously (particularly around town.)....
To make things perfect we also have a CR-V for grocery shopping and running around in town and for the wife to commute to and from work....
If the minivan is like a commercial van with steel floors and unfinished sides, then maybe, but I'm not sure I would want to haul a load of manure in one. However, if it's one of those "soccer mom" minivans with seats and upholstery, designed more for hauling people than stuff, then, no.A minivan can do 90% of what a Ridgeline does, more cheaply and more efficently. Anyone who bought a Ridgeline instead of a minivan must be a chump, right?0
![]()
or a generator, gas cans, lawn mower, lawn tractor, motorcycle, dirt, bluestone, firewood, sand, cement bags, cobble stones, bricks, garbage....need I go on?If the minivan is like a commercial van with steel floors and unfinished sides, then maybe, but I'm not sure I would want to haul a load of manure in one. However, if it's one of those "soccer mom" minivans with seats and upholstery, designed more for hauling people than stuff, then, no.