Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner

RL G2 was built as a gentleman's truck

10241 Views 34 Replies 19 Participants Last post by  marjamr
The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was not built to be a roughneck truck or a rock crawler, it was built to be a gentleman's truck.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 20 of 35 Posts
I totally agree. I have no use for the big bloated beasts today's trucks have become. I love my Hondameno.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I live in a very truck rich area in CT. Some of these trucks are jacked up high enought to almost need a ladder to get into. The diesel guys have exhaust system so large that a woodchuck could live in the tail pipes. Some have aftermarket turbo systems with enough psi to blow over street signs at fifty yards. Their 'Jake brakes' and compression releif valves can scare def folks to death with all the noise these machines produce. It goes without saying that a ton of money went into these things. Some owners like to go mudding (probabbly a ton of fun :smile:) and as a badge of courage leave as much mud on their trucks for as long as they can.
What I'm trying to say is these super duty vehicles, often refered to as 'Broodozzers', have become today's younger mans sports car. It's a rare sight to see any of them doing any truck like duties with their [truck] aftermarket show cases. I'm still not quite sure why 'Broodozzers' seem to be chick magnets?
I've had my share of soild axel trucks (all 4x4) that I typically bought to use for garden work, light duty hauling, our once weekly dump run or just getting around in if it snows. The new Ridgeline [for me] is the perfect vehicle for what I need from a truck and lets me ride comfortably in quiet when it's not being used as a truck.
I'm surprized that so many truck buyers these days still think they need huge body on frame, solid axel, full sized trucks to do all the things - that they probabbly will never do?
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Commodore, nice handle, has a better ring to it than Commode Odor.

I am in complete agreement with you. I think the G1 too is a gentlemans truck, I think that Honda gave it a bit beefier look to better sell to truck buyers. There were G1's that were lifted and had bigger tires put on them making them somewhat better off road but, some still whined that they were not that great as an off road vehicle. They are not, they do very well on unimproved roads and adverse weather but, they are too stiff to climb really rough stuff and the drive system is not made for that. It is a front wheel drive vehicle that can shift power to the rear momentarily as needed or be held into lock out for getting out of tough spots. This feature is time and speed limited as the clutch packs can not dissipate heat well enough for continued operation. Hence this truck will never be capable of continued off road duty a true 4X4 is capable of and that is fine for me. What Honda has built suits my needs perfectly and it is a fine road car. Its on road abilities blow the doors off those ladder and frame 4X4.

I believe this segment originally created by the G1 Ridgeline is far better defined and understood in the market. The G2 being made a bit softer looking will likely sell far better as people now understand what this truck is. The brawny look of the G1 may have created some disappointment when it did not live up to its tough look. Those of us who appreciate it for what it is and not what it looks to be love them dearly. The look of the G1 cut two ways, it sold trucks but, made some haters when it did not live up to its look.
See less See more
I live in a very truck rich area in CT. Some of these trucks are jacked up high enought to almost need a ladder to get into. The diesel guys have exhaust system so large that a woodchuck could live in the tail pipes. Some have aftermarket turbo systems with enough psi to blow over street signs at fifty yards. Their 'Jake brakes' and compression releif valves can scare def folks to death with all the noise these machines produce. It goes without saying that a ton of money went into these things. Some owners like to go mudding (probabbly a ton of fun :smile:) and as a badge of courage leave as much mud on their trucks for as long as they can.
What I'm trying to say is these super duty vehicles, often refered to as 'Broodozzers', have become today's younger mans sports car. It's a rare sight to see any of them doing any truck like duties with their [truck] aftermarket show cases. I'm still not quite sure why 'Broodozzers' seem to be chick magnets?
I've had my share of soild axel trucks (all 4x4) that I typically bought to use for garden work, light duty hauling, our once weekly dump run or just getting around in if it snows. The new Ridgeline [for me] is the perfect vehicle for what I need from a truck and lets me ride comfortably in quiet when it's not being used as a truck.
I'm surprized that so many truck buyers these days still think they need huge body on frame, solid axel, full sized trucks to do all the things - that they probabbly will never do?
holy crap thats funny. They should sell a grate to cover the tail pipe to keep out the critters.
Yeah, thought about bolting a garbage can under my bumper just to see if it made me feel more capable. Maybe two of them, always liked dual exhaust.
The diesel guys have exhaust system so large that a woodchuck could live in the tail pipes.
holy crap thats funny. They should sell a grate to cover the tail pipe to keep out the critters.
Yeah, that's so you can't stuff a potato or banana in it. But you could get them during watermelon season 0:)
Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.

I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).

Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.

I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).

Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
Agreed, a CRV type of vehicle hits the sweet spot but is a little boring. RL could be overkill but the same argument could be said for Pilot vs. CRV, Explorer vs. Escape, etc. You have to draw the line somewhere on where the minimum threshold is. Of all the trucks out there, the RL is at the lower end size wise.
Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.

I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).

Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
Agreed, a CRV type of vehicle hits the sweet spot but is a little boring. RL could be overkill but the same argument could be said for Pilot vs. CRV, Explorer vs. Escape, etc. You have to draw the line somewhere on where the minimum threshold is. Of all the trucks out there, the RL is at the lower end size wise.
I find the RLs to be the perfect blend for my needs. I drive 125 out to the ranch in amazing comfort, excellent handling and decent gas milage with tools and gear loaded in the bed, then drive 1 mile on caliche/gravel roads to camp. No concerns with gas vapors from gas cans since they are in the bed and no guilt hauling a deer etc back home in the bed. It also fits in the garage better than the "big boys".

To make things perfect we also have a CR-V for grocery shopping and running around in town and for the wife to commute to and from work.

As a truck, the RL's may be judged with "Low T", but I'm not insecure driving it. :grin:
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Belittle the Big Trucks all you want ... by accurately proclaiming that most of their life those Big Beasts are not used to their full potential - but the same argument can be made for the much smaller beast RL.

I really liked my Ridge - but most of the time (when traveling without my dogs) I found my hatchback to be more useful as an around town Lowes runner/ grocery getter. Tag along a small trailer and in a pinch it duplicates many RL skillsets (excluding the higher seating position - and the smile on my face).

Finally - I suspect most gentleman ride in the back seats of luxury automobiles; I suggest you think of RL owners as sophisticated people looking for a good, and capable, buggy.
It's not belittling big trucks at all. The folks in in the crosshairs are those with the overdeveloped peacock gene who take said truck (or tuner car or whatever else) and pour so many bucks into customizing it that the vehicle becomes less and less practical at what it was meant to do.

Look at the folks who run smokestacks in the bed so they can drive down the road pumping black smoke and screaming look at me. They're trading useful cargo area for the opportunity to be a clown car in their own personal parade.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
It's not belittling big trucks at all. The folks in in the crosshairs are those with the overdeveloped peacock gene who take said truck (or tuner car or whatever else) and pour so many bucks into customizing it that the vehicle becomes less and less practical at what it was meant to do.

Look at the folks who run smokestacks in the bed so they can drive down the road pumping black smoke and screaming look at me. They're trading useful cargo area for the opportunity to be a clown car in their own personal parade.
Not too much has changed over the years. It's kinda like 'lake pipes' on the lowered (we now say 'slammed) 1948 Mercury lead sleds that were cool in the 50s. Custom cars like that were a symbol of rebeliousness back in the day (James Dean 'Reble without a cause') but don't drive that old Merc over a pencil sized twig or attempt turning up a driveway. Like many of the monster trucks we see these days the word useful/practical would not be an adjective used to discribe those creations.
The main attraction of 'struttin' in a decked out car or truck is that you can strut your individuallity in so many places because a car or truck has become a mobile stage. The larger the audience the more fun it is or was.
All boys/guys/men are guilty of having a bit of the small ----- syndrom at one time in their life. An over the top vehicle was one way of saying "not me". Ultra luxury car manufactures have sucessfully used that marketing formula for a very long time.
I think what I'm trying to say is that it's getting more and more difficult (and expensive) to get noticed these days. Anyone remember the cloths pin holding a playing card on the spokes of your bycycle days? Regardless of where you rode your bike people always looked ....................and we liked it. Glass packed mufflers realy didn't make a car quicker but it did make your car sound like a race car and therefor everyone knew your car had to be faster. Sometimes it's tough to grow up :frown::laugh:. I've decided not to for a long time.
Got to run and install an 11 inch lift kit on my new Ridgeline :grin:.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Agreed, a CRV type of vehicle hits the sweet spot but is a little boring. RL could be overkill but the same argument could be said for Pilot vs. CRV, Explorer vs. Escape, etc. You have to draw the line somewhere on where the minimum threshold is. Of all the trucks out there, the RL is at the lower end size wise.


....

To make things perfect we also have a CR-V for grocery shopping and running around in town and for the wife to commute to and from work....
Wéve got the full spectrum covered with a G2 CRV, G1 Pilot, and G1 Ridgeline. I've only had the RL for 3-4 weeks now, but so far it's getting better mpg than the Pilot. The CRV is a bit better, but not tremendously (particularly around town.)

We also have a VW that gets 40 mpg city and 48-50 highway. So I'm not sure there's a great argument for any of the Hondas based on mpg. But the Ridgeline offers some very flexible functionality that makes it a good tool to have in the inventory. I can see us "excessing" the Pilot in the not too distant future.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I use sailboats, airplanes and mountain bikes for my ego pumps, pretty well leave my cars alone.

When my youngest son started driving we purchased a nice older Subaru Impreza. Of course he wanted to turn it into WRX. I tried to convince him the more he messed with it the less it would be worth. It may appeal to another kid, but they usually have no money. An adult buyer does not want to buy a car that belonged to Johny Rocket. Bought my older son a Civic when looking we avoided the rice rocket cars.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
A minivan can do 90% of what a Ridgeline does, more cheaply and more efficently. Anyone who bought a Ridgeline instead of a minivan must be a chump, right? :) 0:)
But, a minivan is not a gentleman's truck. :)
  • Like
Reactions: 1
A minivan can do 90% of what a Ridgeline does, more cheaply and more efficently. Anyone who bought a Ridgeline instead of a minivan must be a chump, right? :) 0:)
If the minivan is like a commercial van with steel floors and unfinished sides, then maybe, but I'm not sure I would want to haul a load of manure in one. However, if it's one of those "soccer mom" minivans with seats and upholstery, designed more for hauling people than stuff, then, no.
If the minivan is like a commercial van with steel floors and unfinished sides, then maybe, but I'm not sure I would want to haul a load of manure in one. However, if it's one of those "soccer mom" minivans with seats and upholstery, designed more for hauling people than stuff, then, no.
or a generator, gas cans, lawn mower, lawn tractor, motorcycle, dirt, bluestone, firewood, sand, cement bags, cobble stones, bricks, garbage....need I go on?
An RL is not a pilot with a bed, or a minivan, it is a midsize pickup truck. Its not the heaviest duty truck out there, but it is a truck.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Well if you're gonna get picky ...

while YMMV the Ridge is primarily a people mover with a small open bed - that makes it easy for thieves to ply their trade; and I've never (not once) seen a Ridge hauling manure.

Attachments

See less See more
1 - 20 of 35 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top