If it was me, I'd put it on 4 jack stands, and check the "steering wheel" when not under load of the tires on the ground.
But I've never heard of this one, keep us informed
But I've never heard of this one, keep us informed
Yeah, rear camber. So if rear camber can be out of alignment, what would be the purpose of engineering it without adjustment capabilities?If I recall correctly, I was told by my alignment shop that there is no adjustment for rear camber on the Ridgeline.
Tie rod end joints are too tight, and take a set in 1 direction. Happened to me many years ago with a Bronco II
I have quit trying to figure out why engineers do things that seem to oppose common sense. If I recall correctly, there might be an aftermarket kit available that allows rear camber adjustment.Yeah, rear camber. So if rear camber can be out of alignment, what would be the purpose of engineering it without adjustment capabilities?
Normally the alignment is very minor and can be done. However, the tolerances do not accommodate a 2 inch drop or a 2 inch lift. The truck was not engineered to be lifted or lowered as to stay true to its designed purpose. Even with these camber kits, you can prevent the wear of the tires, but cannot prevent the added wear on the drive line.Yeah, rear camber. So if rear camber can be out of alignment, what would be the purpose of engineering it without adjustment capabilities?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk