Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner
21 - 37 of 37 Posts
I have these Conti HT tires 255 50 20 with 2019 20in Pilot wheels on my Ridgeline. They're a little quiter, but not much. Paid almost a grand installed and swapping the oem tpms to it from Discount tire back in November. The 20" rims plus the added 5lbs and height of each tires feels very heavy on my Ridgeline. The result is 2-5mpg loss, slowed acceleration at dead stop and highway speeds, and a little delayed shift to higher gear. The 255s are barely wider than the OE firestone.
I also put a set of the LX25 size 245 50 20 on our Pilot 20' OE wheels. It's as wide as the 255 HT and a little quiter than both the HT and LE2 Firestone. It also absorbs the bumps and noise better as well.
Overall, the Conti HT and LX25 are an improvent over the LE2 in noise, wear, and in wet weather conditions, but i prefer the look of the LE2.
 
Bumping this conversation hoping to hear some feedback on the Conti TerrainContact H/T and CrossContact LX25 tires. I am in the same boat, considering the two.
I see in the December 2020 Consumer Reports that the TerrainContact tires are a recommended buy where the CrossContact are not (although their scores appear to be comparable).
 
Discussion starter · #25 ·
Are you still happy with these Contis? I'm trying to decide between the TerrainContact H/T and the CrossContact LX25 for my 2010 Pilot
Hey, I apologize for not responding to this earlier. If you are still looking at tires, I would absolutely recommend the Terrain Contact HTs. They have been awesome for me. Quiet, smooth, and the best wet-traction I've ever had on rain and sleet/freezing rain.

I still have not had significant snow around here, so I can't really speak to that. But so far they've been the best tires I've had.
 
Are you still happy with these Contis? I'm trying to decide between the TerrainContact H/T and the CrossContact LX25 for my 2010 Pilot
I actually threw some Destination AT2s on mine a couple of months ago. A hair louder on the highway but wet traction and stopping distances are awesome. They're also snow & ice rated, so I can't wait for real winter here and test them out! That was my issue with the OEM tires, they sucked on the snow and ice!
 
Just put a set of Terrain Contact H/T's on my 17 Ridge (factory size). They are great so far.
Things I noticed:
They feel a tiny bit heavier on acceleration (which they are I think 1LB) but feel lighter when turning.

They dampen the bumps and potholes much better.

My mileage is down by .4 mpg but this could be winter gas?

We just had about 7inches of snow and there isn't even a comparison between the factory firestones and the contacts. The contacts are 100x better accelerating and braking. keep in mind my firestones had over 40k on them.

The contacts feel more planted to the road but when on certain road surfaces the tracking of the tire is different, not bad or good just different than the firestones.

I really cant tell a difference in ride comfort or noise level. They seem to be about the same. I would give a slight edge to the contacts but its probably because they are new. Both are/were good in these areas.

If you are looking for a highway tire, I would definitely recommend the Terrain Contact H/T. I would rate them a 9.5 out of 10. This is with only 350 miles on them so please take that into consideration.
 
I'm trying to decide what to replace my OEM 44k miles tires with. The Terrain Contact H/Ts or The Destination LE3s. Anyone have the LE3s?

I live in NC so snow is like 1 day a year, but we do travel to the mountains and to Tennessee. I would also like to travel to see family up north (Western PA and Canada) eventually and will deal with snow at some point. Looking to keep the quietness of the OEMs or quieter. Wife doesn't want to sacrifice the quiet ride.
 
This section of the forums is DEAD. I went ahead and bought the LE3s. Fantastic so far in wet and a few inches of snow. Much improved over my LE2s. They look the same but perform even better. Quiet and handles like I'm glued to the road. Feels like it absorbs bumps better too. If you liked the OEM's get the LE3's, they are just a better tire in every aspect, no cons in my opinion. Unless you need AT's, I dont see a reason to buy the Continentals. They stop shorter in wet but not by a ton. other than that the continentals look more aggressive if you can call it that. They are 3 lbs heavier as well. Which would likely change MPG if you care about that.
 
Im not sure if you know but there are Terrain Contact A/T and Terrain Contact H/T. This thread is about the H/T (Highway Tread). You mentioned the A/T's in your last post so Im not sure if you realized there are 2 different models.

I looked at the LE3's also but it came down to the H/T's thread should last longer and I got a 80 dollar mail in rebate from Continental. Let me know how the LE3's do in some deeper snow. Thanks!
 
I put a set of LE3's on my '17 E yesterday. Initial feedback is plesant, quite ride (dry) with better bump dampening than the LE2's it appears. I just couldn't pass up the value of the LE3's after a lot of consideration and my needs. $1000 out the door with lifetime alignment, road hazard, and Texas inspection was satisfying for me.
 
I actually threw some Destination AT2s on mine a couple of months ago. A hair louder on the highway but wet traction and stopping distances are awesome. They're also snow & ice rated, so I can't wait for real winter here and test them out! That was my issue with the OEM tires, they sucked on the snow and ice!
Destination AT2s passed first test with flying colors! This is actually a sidewalk, so I backed into it by first jumping the curb.
409213
 
How are you guys getting 40k+ mi out of the OEM Firestone LE2's? Mine are at 25k and won't make it to 30k.

Looking at these Terrain Contact HT's and hoping they'll do better in the longevity department.
A lot depends on driving conditions, mine are doing very well but only 24K miles on them thus far. Owned another set of LE2's on a '13 Honda CRV that went over 55K miles and was very happy with them for my daily needs over some very frost-cratered highways. The main reason they got replaced was some quirky handling behavior emerged late in their life that by speculation was tire casings starting to fail. But that wasn't discovered until they were dismounted and noticed the crazy-soft sidewalls (likely from the cratered roads). New Cooper CS5's made a world of difference on that CRV for similar money.
 
I got 40k out of my LE2's and it was easy really. Two tires at 40,700 were at 3/32 and two were at 5/32. The two at 3/32 were a result of those two positions having problems with the alignment. When i put on the new one I had them 4 wheel align the truck and they mentioned those two being out specifically. And only I rotated the tires. So it was easily a controlled "experiment" so to speak. On mine I know I could have gotten at least another 5 - 10k out of them with careful driving but since I tow to the snow in the winter I wasn't prepared to take chances and put new ones on. The Destination tires have performed well for me on two vehicles now. My 12' Ford Escape and also on the 17' Ridgeline.
 
Doing my research on these tires. I was looking at going a size bigger (265/60/18). I'm concerned with weight and handling. It looks like the stock Firestones are 32lbs, the same size Continentals H/T are 32.1lbs.

In 265/60/18 the Continental H/T's are 36.4lbs and the popular Michelin Defender LTX's are 37.3lbs. I'm really leaning towards the bigger Continentals. 4lbs a tire shouldn't cause a huge difference. I sure would like to see and hear from someone with them on their RL.
Did you get these? I just ordered them in this size & everything.
 
Considering these in a 245/70/17 - seems like folks have run the A/T version just fine, but I don't need the AT tire in central OH. Hoping I wouldn't get an rubbing with the larger size, and it wouldn't be too big of an MPG hit
 
21 - 37 of 37 Posts