Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner
161 - 180 of 246 Posts
From Honda, RL in Ash Green

(Not sure of exact trim, it's off their main 2026 Ridgeline page.)

Edit - I just found out the trim. It's a Trailsport with the optional HPD Front Grille accessory and non standard HPD wheels that are an option on the 2026 BE but not the Trailsport.


View attachment 471289
find it odd Honda just offers the trailsport + the hpd wheels but not the entire hpd addons. however, they do in BE
 
And no Red BE!
That's crazy, I just saw the color selection, and I thought they'd add colors for 26. I bought mine this year (Sonic Grey) and since blue is my favorite color, I was afraid they would make a blue B.E. for 26, but NOPE! Instead, they removed color choices for the B.E. and got rid of the Trailsport light blue, added green and adjusted colors for the other trims. Hmmmmm, interesting discussions in the marketing meetings. Oh well, with this wild world, there's more important things to be concerned with.
 
As expected, not many changes.

  • ~$450 price hike on all trims
  • Trailsport gets a new colour - Ash Green, first seen on the 2026 MY Passport
  • Choice of either a contrasting black roof or body colour roof for the Black Edition trim, in either Sonic Gray Pearl or Platinum White Pearl exterior colours.

I think that's about it.

https://hondanews.com/en-US/honda-a...ugged-2026-honda-ridgeline-now-arriving-at-dealers-with-refreshed-color-options
I am over black wheels. That is what keeps me from buying the Black Edition. Even the Trailsport wheels are crap.
 
Discussion starter · #170 ·
Hear me out, Ridgeline Peeps.
I foresee Honda doing several things for 2027 and beyond:
1) GEN3 Ridgeline will continue as a unibody construction with a hybrid option and possibly a turbocharged motor.
2) It will also launch another body-on-frame truck, in partnership with Nissan, building them from its Assembly Plant in Mississippi. The truck(s) may be a pickup or SUV.
I agree that if Honda offer a hybrid down the line that a RL woud eventually be offered with one but not ahead of it first going in the Pilot and then the Passport.

As regards item 2, never say never starnget things have happened.
 
Discussion starter · #171 ·
What an absolute crying shame !
No real updates after all the hype , speculation, and suggestions from loyal Ridgeline owners and people looking to purchase.
Like a cold slap in the face of reality, Honda is once again dragging it's feet on things that could take the great Ridgeline , and make it even better. Things Honda already has in other vehicles .
I'll never understand why Honda takes so long for updates, when other car companies like the Korean twins can and do make significant changes,even total redesigns on three year cycles, and minor accessory changes yearly.
The point is, and I don't speak for everyone, but some people shop for a replacement vehicle when their old one is wearing out, or has issues, and hold off buying when they find something they like, but doesn't quite have something they really want or need. But they can't wait for over a year or two. They have to buy sooner than later, and if they do buy the existing model with old tech, or a couple things that desperately need updated, they are not happy customers, and find other things they don't like which becomes a focus. True, no one is fully 100 percent happy with a new purchase, after the either wears off and a few months go by, and the new Larger Payments become a reality.
Reading these forums gives one hope and a sense the manufacturer may listen and pay attention to loyal owners input, about their discussed vehicle. Sort of like a huge focus group, telling the manufacturer, this is what we want, or need, or would make this vehicle great, even better than now and improve sales.
Guess that's not the case with Honda?
The Ridgeline is desirable in its current form , but could be Stellar with a few modern changes.
From my reading this forum , owners input tell me Reliability is NOT what some would expect of Honda with things like having to change transmission fluid FAR more often than other brands, to prevent problems same with rear differential fluids. Some manufacturers recommend only 100k mile changes and the vehicles do just fine. Timing belts rather than a chain and good tensioner system , while somewhat quieter , are a maintenance hastle. Over complicated systems such as cylinder deactivation are expensive time bombs , for the sake of economy they don't actually deliver.
Those items, may be an engineers dream, but for owners , they can turn into an expensive nightmare.
I'll end my opinion post, saying I'm deeply disappointed in Hondas lack of update for the Ridgeline, which happens to be my number one choice for replacing my current vehicle. The current model and it seems for two more model years, is okay, however the price increases on the already high priced Ridgeline (class comparative) and not even a simple update like a 360 degree camera option, are leaving me in the hold on to the old vehicle a while longer and see what other manufacturers do this next model year category...
I often get the feeling that Honda has ten very skilled hands but that individually they don't know what the other hands are doing.

They then all have a meeting and make the ten ideas sorta work, even if they really don't, instead of making changes so that things are better. A glaring example of this mis-mash of ideas is the crazy, mechanically indefnsible, placemnet of the air intake straight over the top of the battery. Insane.

But then they come up with gems like the in-bed trunk and swing out tailgate.

But then they have stupid, un-necessary cylinder deactivation that on-one wants.

A very frustraing company to love.
 
As expected, not many changes.

  • ~$450 price hike on all trims
  • Trailsport gets a new colour - Ash Green, first seen on the 2026 MY Passport
  • Choice of either a contrasting black roof or body colour roof for the Black Edition trim, in either Sonic Gray Pearl or Platinum White Pearl exterior colours.

I think that's about it.

https://hondanews.com/en-US/honda-a...ugged-2026-honda-ridgeline-now-arriving-at-dealers-with-refreshed-color-options
Well, that's disappointing. $450 for your choice of colors.
A Bigger gas tank, higher clearance, stronger step bumper, stronger tailgate, ability to tow more and a skid plate for all models are all items where an upgrade is needed and would have been enthusiasticly welcomed.
 
Discussion starter · #175 ·
Well, that's disappointing. $450 for your choice of colors.
A Bigger gas tank, higher clearance, stronger step bumper, stronger tailgate, ability to tow more and a skid plate for all models are all items where an upgrade is needed and would have been enthusiasticly welcomed.
I honestly think that if a potentail purchaser wants those features they have to be looking at something other than a Ridgeline. For me, and thousands of others being to tow 5000lb give or take is ample.

However, if Honda did bring out a BOF version of the Ridgeline "super duty tow" or something, you'd be in luck! (Probably.)
 
Don't get me wrong, I love my RL; those are just suggestions for Honda to consider when they do their annual upgrade. So far, 5k has worked for me, but I have been looking at travel trailers and our choices of what to pull are there, but very limited. Oh yeah, and did I mention they can add an upgrade to their ancient infotainment center too. All looking to do better.
 
A bit too much coffee today?? No I don't mean that all it takes to make a Ridgeline is to "add length." Who said the unibody was identical? And yes the unibody is strengthened for truck duty as it actually needs to be to create a truck with the Ridgeline's capacities. Honda did a good job engineering a truck but still using close to 70% common parts with the Pilot. They basically did what was needed but they didn't give a major RD budget and there isn't anything significantly unique in fundamentals like powertrain, suspension design etc. It shares the same Global Truck Platform that the 3rd Generation Pilot did. The end result is a more carlike / crossover like vehicle experience.
I've owned a Ridgeline since 2005 so I am quite aware of what the advantages are of the platform. Many of us on this forum back in 2015 "watched" as the GenII info was trickled out through some insider info. It started to become clear than the GenII was not going to see a large development budget like the GenI did. The GenI was based on the same platform that the Pilot at the time used but saw serious RD investment and only shared something like 20-30% parts commonality with other models. For the GenII Honda went in the direction of turning the Pilot into a truck. This philosophy is likely to continue with the GenIII.

" Whether people here like it or not, Honda's model for the Ridgeline is to do just (and only just) what it takes to turn the Pilot into a truck. " and "For the GenII Honda went in the direction of turning the Pilot into a truck." Who said that?

I'd think someone who owned one since 2005 would have a better summary than that. Heck I've only had one two years and I wouldn't say that. Seems like they put a bit of thought into both vehicles, sometimes similar/same, sometimes not. If it doesn't use the same pan, is longer, has driveline differences, that doesn't seem like they did "do just (and only just) what it takes to turn the Pilot into a truck" or "went in the direction of turning the Pilot into a truck".

It actually seems like they did what motorcyclists would call "parts bin" bikes, only in this case they used the interior and, I think, the front clip. Obviously from the general area of the A pillars back are not Pilot. And I think you know it may have some similarity, but it certainly isn't "just what it takes to turn the Pilot into a truck.

But in checking out information on the Pilot and the Ridgeline it seems maybe Honda upsized the Pilot to take advantage of the new truck look and parts back in 2006, but the Pilot actually didn't look like the Ridgeline until around 2008 in the Gen 2. Then in 2014 the Pilot Gen 3 led the way, with the Ridgeline Gen 2 following in 2017.

So it seems Honda is using both to feed on design with transferable parts. That and from what is said in Wikipedia the Honda pickup was first started with an Acura MDX in 2001.
The development started in 2001 with a development mule using an extended version of a first-generation Acura MDX with a competitor's pickup bed integrated into the rear structure.
So it seems the whole "based on a Pilot" is a bit presumptive. It seems both kind of fed off each other in design. Kind of fraternal twins in design.

It's kind of fun to do some background research on stuff for me. And oOnly one 12oz cup of coffee this morning.
 
" Whether people here like it or not, Honda's model for the Ridgeline is to do just (and only just) what it takes to turn the Pilot into a truck. " and "For the GenII Honda went in the direction of turning the Pilot into a truck." Who said that?

I'd think someone who owned one since 2005 would have a better summary than that. Heck I've only had one two years and I wouldn't say that. Seems like they put a bit of thought into both vehicles, sometimes similar/same, sometimes not. If it doesn't use the same pan, is longer, has driveline differences, that doesn't seem like they did "do just (and only just) what it takes to turn the Pilot into a truck" or "went in the direction of turning the Pilot into a truck".

It actually seems like they did what motorcyclists would call "parts bin" bikes, only in this case they used the interior and, I think, the front clip. Obviously from the general area of the A pillars back are not Pilot. And I think you know it may have some similarity, but it certainly isn't "just what it takes to turn the Pilot into a truck.

But in checking out information on the Pilot and the Ridgeline it seems maybe Honda upsized the Pilot to take advantage of the new truck look and parts back in 2006, but the Pilot actually didn't look like the Ridgeline until around 2008 in the Gen 2. Then in 2014 the Pilot Gen 3 led the way, with the Ridgeline Gen 2 following in 2017.

So it seems Honda is using both to feed on design with transferable parts. That and from what is said in Wikipedia the Honda pickup was first started with an Acura MDX in 2001.
The development started in 2001 with a development mule using an extended version of a first-generation Acura MDX with a competitor's pickup bed integrated into the rear structure.
So it seems the whole "based on a Pilot" is a bit presumptive. It seems both kind of fed off each other in design. Kind of fraternal twins in design.

It's kind of fun to do some background research on stuff for me. And oOnly one 12oz cup of coffee this morning.
Honda has sold 2-4 times as many Pilots per year as Ridgelines. It is is their bread and butter large vehicle. Without the Pilot, the Ridgeline simply wouldn't exist. Pilot leads and Passport and Ridge follows. This has been their philosophy for a while (really came to full form in the 2010s)

GenI Ridge (2006 first model year) used a platform (as a basis) that was originally designed for the MDX. Most (not all though) of it's parts were unique to the Ridgeline. The GenII Pilot (2009 first model year) used this platform as it's basis as well but shared only limited parts with the GenI Ridge. Then came the bean counters saying the Ridge doesn't sell well enough to spend lots of R&D money on . . . GenIII Pilot was well along into it's development . . .Higher ups gave the GenII Ridgeline team a limited budget, the requirement for as much parts commonality as possible and told them to build a truck. Sit in GenIII Pilot and look forward and then sit in GenII Ridge and do the same. Particularly with the 2017-2020 Ridges, you would be hard pressed to tell much difference. Same if you look under the hood (Pilot switched to the 9 speed sooner than the Ridge did) Same if you look at the front suspension, and the IVTM4 unit. Rear of the cab of the Ridge still built on what Honda calls their Global Truck Platform, but obviously customized to create a 4 door truck. This IS what it takes to turn a Pilot into a truck. 73% parts commonality between GenII Ridge and GenIII Pilot.

What does this mean for the future Ridgeline (unless they decide to completely change their Philosophy)? They won't create a unique ground up truck platform, they won't give the Ridgeline it's own truck oriented power train (maybe some minor tuning) They won't give the Ridge it's own trucky front interior (minor tweaks only), etc etc etc. Future Ridgeline will continue to be much like the Pilot / Passport in the way it drives, looks (at the front), in its fuel economy and likely in it's tow ratings as well. If you see a new development in the Pilot / Passport (like a sort of serious off road package for instance) then you might see that in the Ridgeline. If you see a hybrid power train in the Pilot / Passport, you might see that in the Ridgeline. That said you most certainly won't see major new features from the current Pilot / Passport in the Ridgeline until it is built on the same version of the Honda's global truck platform. That is to say until we get a GENIII Ridgeline.

Overall, Honda is highly unlikely to lead with the Ridgeline. The Pilot makes them much more money. When you see these crazy speculations about the next Ridgeline and the features aren't at all parallel to what you see in the current Pilot then you can be almost certain that they are BS.

Mr Mark, you are arguing semanitics but aren't really getting what I am saying. Kind of looking to disagree seems to me. Kind of tedious. Have fun.
 
Hear me out, Ridgeline Peeps.
I foresee Honda doing several things for 2027 and beyond:
1) GEN3 Ridgeline will continue as a unibody construction with a hybrid option and possibly a turbocharged motor.
2) It will also launch another body-on-frame truck, in partnership with Nissan, building them from its Assembly Plant in Mississippi. The truck(s) may be a pickup or SUV.
Strange....those are the same things people were talking about for the 2026 Model. Didn't happen. Wish it would.
 
Strange....those are the same things people were talking about for the 2026 Model. Didn't happen. Wish it would.
Unfortunately Im beginning to lean towards Honda doing the unthinkable...discontinuation
They just dont care about this vehicle and if they did it would not be languishing so far behind the times as they have let it.
 
161 - 180 of 246 Posts