Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner
1 - 20 of 117 Posts

phineas

· Premium Member
2017 Ridgeline RTL-E | Northeast U.S.
Joined
·
2,974 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 · (Edited)
Part I:

No, the Lomax is not a Dr. Seuss character. It's a low-profile aluminum tonneau with several innovative design points. Think of "Low Max" as the general meaning behind this product's name. And it lives up to its billing, laying impressively flat on the back of the Ridgeline. Unlike most low-profile tonneaus, it lays on top of the bedcaps (the flat black plastic pieces that cover the top of the bed sidewalls) and is ingeniously designed to save space, stay dry, and look great doing it.

The Honda Ridgeline is equally at ease going out on the town as it is going out to a job site. Agri-Cover's Lomax is the tonneau perfectly matched to the versatile character of the second-generation (G2) Ridgeline. The tonneau's sleek good looks disguise strong aluminum alloy panels, a solid rail system, excellent perimeter seal, water-resistant hinges, a 10-point automatic locking system, and easy one-person temporary removal.

Image

Lomax and Ridgeline delivering wood to my workshop.

I've spent six months evaluating the Lomax with my 2017 RTL-E Honda Ridgeline. In the process, I've figured out how to make it as watertight as possible. I've hauled numerous loads with the trifold in its maximum two-thirds open position. I have wiped snow and ice off it, blown leaves off it, sprayed water at it to test for leakage, and wiped it down after carwashes. I've installed it at least five times. The Lomax was even on board when my truck was rear-ended, coming through it unscathed. It's never given me a reason to doubt its ruggedness or let me down in any way. Moreover, every month or two I discover something new about it that impresses me.

A note about keeping your bed dry, a top priority for many. I opted to cover this aspect of the review in a companion article, Lomax Installation Tips. I rate the Lomax four stars out of five on its ability to keep the bed dry for those who follow those steps. The G2 Ridgeline also has issues that prevent any tonneau from being watertight without modification. See this article, How to Make the G2 Bed More Watertight, to learn how to solve that problem.

Low and Space Saving

The first thing you notice about this tonneau is how great it looks on the 2017-19+ Ridgeline. The recipe starts with the fact that the aluminum top is only 9/128th of an inch thick (as measured with a digital caliper). That's just over 1/16 of an inch or just under 2 mm. Stir in the beefy perimeter seal and the total thickness of the visible from the outside part of the cover is roughly 7/16 of an inch. The Lomax beats the Honda key fob at being thin.

Image

The Lomax cover is quite a bit thinner than the Ridgeline's key fob. Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."

Some of you are wondering: "Great, but does that mean I get the full height of my bed with the Lomax?" Yes and no. Let's start with reference measurements because everyone measures the bed height differently. When measured from the lowest part of the bed -- the valleys between the raised runners in the floor -- to the top of the bedcaps is 17 inches. But the real-world number is the one measured from the top of the raised runners since you can't load cargo into the valleys of the floor. That number is 16-3/4 inches, and all further measurements discussed here are focused on this dimension.

We need to consider a few details before we can answer the poignant question posed in the previous paragraph. Most other hard trifold tonneau makers adhere a foam core of variable thicknesses, but typically about 1 inch, across the whole underside of the panel. Agri-Cover's approach was to add a roughly 7/8-of-an-inch high (it varies slightly) by roughly 1-inch wide boxed subframe placed near the four edges of each panel. Throughout the bed, the Lomax delivers 15-5/8 to 15-3/4 inches under its subframe.

The wide-open centers of the panels are completely unobstructed. These expanses measure 16-3/4 inches from the raised runners to the underside of the cover. So, if you can keep the high parts of your cargo to the center areas of the panels, you'll get the full height of the bed.

Image

Add 2-3/4 inches for the length of the case and measure from the bottom of the tonneau to the valley between two of the floor's raised runners. The outcome is 17 inches.

Most trifold tonneaus have large rubber blocks hanging down from the first or second panel. There are usually two or four of these pads. Their purpose is to support the tonneau when folded so that the panels are level and don't rub together. On some tonneau models, the blocks can hang down as much as 3 inches (plus the thickness of the foam core). These blocks are usually positioned roughly a third of the way in from the bedcaps on either side, where they have the potential to hang up cargo as you load it.

Agri-Cover did something different. And it's shrewd. They use aluminum standoffs with rubber-covered feet that require little space side to side. Here's the smart part: Agri-Cover pushed the location of the standoffs to the outside edges of the bed, up close to the bed walls on either side. So, they don't get in the way of loading cargo. In fact, as you look at the underside of the closed Lomax, there is nothing that gets in the way of cargo; the bottom edge of the subframe is the lowest point.

So, let's review: With many hard trifold tonneaus for the Ridgeline, you're lucky to get 14 inches of unobstructed cargo space below the cover. You can count on at least 15-1/2 inches with a modest clearance under the Lomax throughout your bed. In the large wide-open spaces of the underside of each tonneau panel, you'll get the full 16-3/4 inches. It's the only low-profile hard trifold I'm aware of that, when closed, can fit a Honda bed extender underneath it. Thanks to Seth, Ridgeline Owners Club (ROC) member "gti16vman," for testing this and telling me about it.

Image

The Honda bed extender fits underneath the Lomax low-profile cover. Apparently, it just touches the tonneau but not in a way that seems like it would damage it. Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."

Although other low-profile tonneaus, such as the BAKFlip MX4, sit lower, between the bed walls, none looks better than the Lomax. Moreover, the Lomax does not need or use an internal "rain gutter" and drain system to keep water from flooding the bed when it rains. The Lomax's perimeter seal only overlays the bedcaps by roughly 3/8 of an inch on either side of the bed, but that's enough for it to form the seal needed that makes it watertight along the sides.

Image

The stand-offs keep the tonneau level when folded and isolate the panels from each other to avoid scratches and scuffs.

Pros

Space utilization and functional design
Most people look at the Lomax and see a fashion plate. While there's some truth in that, it's a lot more than just a good-looking tonneau. Some great engineering design work went into this truck cover. I've delved into that in some depth already, so I won't elaborate here except to say that preservation of bed height is very important to Ridgeline owners. The Lomax delivers it.

Light weight and easily removed
Although Agri-Cover says the weight of the Lomax for any truck is about 50 pounds, I'm guessing it's less than that for the 5-foot-long bed of the Ridgeline. I would guess 40 to 45 pounds. That's why removing the tonneau from the truck by yourself on a whim isn't just possible, it's easy. Agri-Cover has streamlined the process of removing the cover. With the tonneau fully folded, each side of its back edge has a release loop. You hook a finger into each of those loops, pull them toward the center, lift the backend of the Lomax, and pull it away from the truck bed.

Close tailgate first? Close tonneau first? Take your pick
A lot of tonneaus quietly offer this feature. But one of the most popular manufacturers, BAK Industries, has made closing the tailgate and cover in either order an upsell feature. BAK only offers the feature on its costlier BAKFlip tonneaus, the MX4 and the F1. For comparison, Honda did the same thing with the 2G Ridgeline's sliding rear window. Initially, it was only available on RTL-E and BE models. Honda has since relented and added it to the are RTL-T too. But it should be standard on all Ridgelines. Just as this ability to zip up the backend of a tonneau in either order should be standard equipment on all manufacturers' trifolds.

Image

The Lomax's rails hug the side of the bed and are not as wide as those of some other companies. The inner portion of the rail goes under the tonneau.

Solid, side-hugging rails
It's all about the number of attachment points. There may be others, but the Lomax is the first tonneau I've researched that uses the three 30 mm Torx bolts in each of the bed walls. Most tonneau makers have opted to use two 50 mm Torx bolts in each corner that anchor the upper tie-downs. The problem with the tie-down conversion attachments is that they flex in the center, which can lead to water leakage. Properly mounted, the Lomax's rails are rock solid. I'm an anti-rail guy from way back. So, this is the first set of real tonneau rails that I've used, and I'm enjoying the experience.

Lomax review continues in the next post …
 
Discussion starter · #2 · (Edited)
Re: Lomax Review: A Near-Perfect Trifold Tonneau for the G2 Ridgeline, PART II

… Lomax review, "Pros" continued

10-point automatic latching with cord release
Coming from the Rugged Liner Premium Hard Folding Tonneau, I have a well-founded appreciation for automatic latches and the handy one-pull release mechanism. The Rugged Liner product has a latch system that is anything but automatic. I found myself wrestling with it on an ongoing basis. You can't argue with the convenience of a pull cord that's right behind the tailgate. (But there is a downside that you'll find under the Cons.)

Image

A look at the safety latch that keeps the folded cover folded while you're driving. Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."

Integrated attach latches for the cover when folded
Most tonneaus use cheap plastic snap clips as a way of keeping the trifold folded when the bed is open. The Lomax uses a proprietary system that relies on stretch bands on either side with aluminum keys that are held in place by corresponding slots. It's a nice feature.

Cons

Is it flimsy?
I hate to use the F word, but it's better to get criticism out in the open. The Lomax has been called flimsy, mostly by buyers who got the tonneau much earlier than Ridgeline owners. There have been two generations of Lomax. The first one used a very different design for the hinges and relied on a less robust version of the subframe. The second-generation Lomax was slipstreamed in May 2018. I could not verify the launch date of the Ridgeline version of the Lomax, but I believe it to have been August or September 2018. Based on videos I've seen of the first-generation Lomax it may well have deserved to have been called flimsy. But I don't think you can fairly apply that description to the second-generation Lomax. I've been using mine for roughly six months; it's holding up fine. That said, it is true that, in making the compromises it does, the Lomax lacks the foam core base that most other trifolds have. So, it is less rigid when it's loose. But strap it into its rail system and you've got plenty of strength there.

Image

This little tab that sticks into the bed from the side rail is a con because most other tonneaus don't have anything like it. But at only 3/4 of an inch and heavily rounded over, it's a tempest in a teapot.

Latch tabs protrude from rails
To support the latching process for their 10-point locking system, Agri-Cover mounted small stubs, or tabs, at the hinge points. The tabs are the anchors for the latchess that protrude inward from the rail toward the center of the bed. Earlier versions of these tabs, which may have been prototypes, were longer and sharper and gave pause for concern. Today, the tabs protrude less than 3/4 of an inch, and their ends are rounded over quite nicely. And don't get any ideas about using a cut-off wheel on your rotary tool. These latch points are necessary to the proper attachment of the tonneau, both for safety and security reasons.

Image

The trunk lid is blocked, yes. But all the Lomax owners who have posted on ROC on this point are unworried about it. You needn't be either. Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."

The rails block the trunk lid
I estimate that the trunk opens 70% of the way with the Lomax installed. That may be a tad less than some other tonneaus. The reason that the stopping point on the rail isn't at the more typical 75% is that the trunk lid directly hits one of the latch tabs described in the previous paragraph. That's the objective information; here's the more subjective information. Honda designed the trunk lid to open probably 35% higher than it needs to. I've included some pictures here so you can see for yourself, but I promise you will not miss the trunk lid's surplus opening height. The trunk lid limitation becomes a non-issue once you see it for yourself.

Image

At night, the bed lights cast some light into the trunk, but the addition of a stick-on LED light strip might be in order.

Quick attach latches are balky when it's cold
For a while, I wasn't sure whether it was my cold fingers or the integrated latches, but trying to latch or unlatch them with room-temperature fingers in the dead of winter showed me that it was not me. When cold, the tolerances are such that the friction appears to be much higher and it becomes harder to get the key in or out of the slot. Not impossible, of course. OK, so this is a nitpick. There's no problem whatsoever in 50° or higher temperatures. It would also be nice if there were a small thumb handle on the back of the key.

Rack system not available for Ridgeline
Some people want to add a rack to their tonneau-covered truck bed. I might consider that for my Ridgeline if I could find a cost-effective solution. The ideal situation is when you can buy the tonneau and rack together from one manufacturer. It's best that the two were designed to work together. Agri-Cover has a product line called Adarac. Unfortunately, the system appears to require the use of stake pocket holes, which our truck doesn't have. Some alternatives don't need stake pockets, such as Vantech. I don't know for sure that the Vantech product will work with the Lomax, however.

Cord-pull tonneau release might be hackable
A couple of years ago I watched a video of a man who used a coat hanger to pick a BAKFlip tonneau's latch in 10 seconds. The design of the Lomax's latch release is very similar to that of the BAKFlip. Both tonneaus use a cord that must be pulled out to release the latch. The cord may be accessed right behind the top of the tailgate. Some people have expressed concern about this. My guess is that the Lomax will be harder to break into. The last panel closes firmly on top of the tailgate with no wiggle or movement. I don't think it would be easy to slip a hanger in there. But I have not tried it for myself to see. This may be the most serious potential shortcoming of the Lomax. But it must be tested first.

Image

The Lomax looks very nice on a black Ridgeline! Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."


The Verdict

If you read the entire article to this point, you already know the gist of my decision about the Lomax. Why? Because no matter how hard I tried, I had trouble coming up with things to criticize. Sure, there's a long list of cons. But there is only one (perhaps two?) that is serious. Not only do I think it's a good tonneau, I think it's the best all-purpose tonneau on the market today for the G2 Ridgeline. It has few drawbacks. It has some serious advantages. It's a good value.

Ultimately choosing a tonneau for the Ridgeline is about identifying your top priorities. Choosing a tonneau for the Ridgeline is much harder than for other trucks. You have considerations like the trunk, the slots in the two forward corners, the two-way tailgate, the shallow bed height, the method of attachment to the truck to name a few. Then you add in the priorities that any tonneau buyer has -- watertightness, security, access to the bed, versatility, ease of temporary removal, ruggedness and the list goes on. What follows are my ratings on several of these priorities. I'm comparing the Lomax to all other hard folding tonneaus that are available for the Ridgeline.

1 Star = Bad Showing <---> 5 Stars = Best in Class

Trunk lid impingement: 3.5 stars

Shallow bed height preservation/space utilization: 5 stars

Watertightness: 4 stars (see fourth paragraph of PART I for important notes)

Method of attachment to the truck: 5 stars

Security: 4 stars (I will reduce this rating if it's shown that the Lomax is vulnerable to the hanger trick)

Good looks: 5 stars

Ease of temporary removal: 5 stars

Access to the bed: 4.5 stars

Overall score: 4.5 stars
(out of 5)

I've studied all the tonneaus on the market for the Ridgeline. As a general purpose solution that just about anyone would be happy with, the Lomax is my first choice. Some people may be better off with one of the specialty tonneaus, like the DiamondBack, Peragon and BAKFlip MX4/UnderCover Ultra Flex. You have to answer that question for yourself. But my considered assessment is that most people will be very happy with the Lomax.

Gratuitous Lomax and Ridgeline Pics

Image

Creating a little chaos with my Ridgeline and Lomax.


Image

The Lomax is slightly grayer than the Ridgeline's bed caps. But the texture is very similar. The Lomax is a bit more reflective than your typical matte finish -- but it is a matte finish.


Image

Agri-Cover includes safety tie-downs, which you can barely see in this photo hanging down from the two rear corners. Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."


Image

Taken in March, longing for baseball and warmer days.


Image

Seth's ride, shiny after a bath. Photo courtesy Seth aka "gti16vman."
 
Well done, very impressive write up!

I echo what phineas says, really love this tonneau. Happy that I can keep the bed extender in there (I keep it in the position closer to the cab normally). Really easy to take off when needed and looks great. Had a Bakflip G2 on my previous truck and while I really liked that cover, I like this one more.
 
Great write-up on the tonneau cover. Makes me wish I’d waited and gotten the Lomax versus the Rugged Liner. Only thing I can say is YOU ROCK! Thanks @phineas.
I see nothing wrong with the Lomax, BUT I would be disappointed that it does not open as far as the UnderCover UltraFlex or the Bakflip MX4.

Great description by @phineas. It is definitely a cover I would have considered, had it been around in it's current configuration, when I purchased my G2 in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrhoundyman
Discussion starter · #7 · (Edited)
I see nothing wrong with the Lomax, BUT I would be disappointed that it does not open as far as the UnderCover UltraFlex or the Bakflip MX4.

Great description by @phineas. It is definitely a cover I would have considered, had it been around in it's current configuration, when I purchased my G2 in 2016.
I didn't include this discussion in the story. It was in there originally but I cut it for space. I really didn't want this to go to three posts. But I awarded the Lomax 4.5 for accessibility to the bed -- while all the covers that tilt up near or against the cab, including the BAKFlips and the Ultra Flex, would get a 5.0 for that factor.

Why is a two-thirds opening trifold getting 4.5 on bed accessibility? It's because of the ease of the removal of the cover. It's quite a bit easier to take the cover off of the Lomax than it is off the Ultra Flex or MX4. The ability to open up the bed for bigger items just by removing the cover is almost as good as the tilt up feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaineMan
I see nothing wrong with the Lomax, BUT I would be disappointed that it does not open as far as the UnderCover UltraFlex or the Bakflip MX4.
Having had a Bakflip before, I agree that flipping all the way up is really nice. As phineas mentions though, it is really easy to take the Lomax completely off. I would say it is much easier than the Bak in both procedure to take off and overall weight. I could do the Bakflip by myself, but it was a little dicey at times because of the bulk of it. With the Lomax, I can pretty easily take it off myself and move it around.

For me personally, I haul something where I need the cover completely off a few times per year. With that being said, a couple advantages of the Lomax completely removed over the Bak flipped up, are that you don't block your back window with the cover and you don't lose 4-5 inches of bed depth because the cover is there.

Realistically, if I hauled taller stuff often, I may have opted for the Bak or something similar. Then again, I like the aesthetics of this one, I may have still gone with it.
 
Discussion starter · #10 · (Edited)
I have the G1 bike rack mounted to the forward upper tie downs. I realize I would have to remove the cover to haul bikes. Would the rack interfere with the installation of the cover?
I'm not familiar with the G1 bike rack. If you can show us a picture of it installed, we might be able to give you a better answer. Assuming that the G1 bike rack's components don't get within, let's say, 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 inches below the top of the bed caps, I don't think you'll have a problem leaving the rack in with the cover on. Or installing the cover. Of all the covers out there right now, I think this one is the most likely to work with your bike rack. But not knowing the bike rack, I can't be 100% sure.
 
It's just a 1" square bar that attaches using the bolts on the forward upper tie downs. It's well below the top of the bed. If the cover doesn't use the tie downs, I think it should work.
Image


Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
Bottom line is that I certainly can't use both at the same time, so if the bar is high, I can always remove it until I need it!

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
 
Discussion starter · #13 ·
Bottom line is that I certainly can't use both at the same time, so if the bar is high, I can always remove it until I need it!

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk


Yup. Also it does not look too high at all. I think you’ll be able to leave it in with the cover on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Re: Lomax Review: A Near-Perfect Trifold Tonneau for the G2 Ridgeline, PART II

An outstanding review, thanks to @phineas (and to Seth aka @gti16vman for his pics).

… Lomax review, "Pros" continued
….

Image

This little tab that sticks into the bed from the side rail is a con because most other tonneaus don't have anything like it. But at only 3/4 of an inch and heavily rounded over, it's a tempest in a teapot.

Latch tabs protrude from rails
To support the latching process for their 10-point locking system, Agri-Cover mounted small stubs, or tabs, at the hinge points. The tabs are the anchors for the latchess that protrude inward from the rail toward the center of the bed. Earlier versions of these tabs, which may have been prototypes, were longer and sharper and gave pause for concern. Today, the tabs protrude less than 3/4 of an inch, and their ends are rounded over quite nicely. And don't get any ideas about using a cut-off wheel on your rotary tool. These latch points are necessary to the proper attachment of the tonneau, both for safety and security reasons.
….
A question / request: Is it possible to post pics showing how and what on the Lomax panels physically 'engages' those latch tabs along the side rail?

Not questioning their necessity in the Lomax design nor challenging that they cannot be cut-off, just struggling to visualize their exact role and would like to understand that. I couldn't figure out that detail even after scouring the Lomax site pics / vids and those posted here, I'm sure it's immediately obvious when 'hands-on' with the cover.

Second question: Is it possible to safely travel with only the rearmost panel 'open'? Not sure if that can be done with any 3-panel rigid cover, just curious about this one.

I've never considered a bed cover for any of my pickups, but this article has me thinking ….

Thanks again for the comprehensive pro/con review and great pics!
 
Discussion starter · #15 · (Edited)
An outstanding review, thanks to @phineas (and to Seth aka @gti16vman for his pics).



A question / request: Is it possible to post pics showing how and what on the Lomax panels physically 'engages' those latch tabs along the side rail?

Not questioning their necessity in the Lomax design nor challenging that they cannot be cut-off, just struggling to visualize their exact role and would like to understand that. I couldn't figure out that detail even after scouring the Lomax site pics / vids and those posted here, I'm sure it's immediately obvious when 'hands-on' with the cover.

Second question: Is it possible to safely travel with only the rearmost panel 'open'? Not sure if that can be done with any 3-panel rigid cover, just curious about this one.

I've never considered a bed cover for any of my pickups, but this article has me thinking ….

Thanks again for the comprehensive pro/con review and great pics!

The automatic latching system requires the stubs to keep the tonneau attached to the rails. So they provide both safety and security. When I have a chance I will try to take a photo of one of the 10 locking points. FWIW, my pic lacks a size reference point and makes the stub look bigger than it is.

One of our members recently found out the hard way that no hard trifold on the market is designed to drive with just one panel open. The panel slammed shut and then detached itself at the hinge. They are all designed to drive only with two panels open latched on both sides.

Most good retractable tonneaus can open in any position or in any of several positions. See the Retrax Pro MX or Peragon.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
  • Like
Reactions: CentexG2
Thank you for all your input on the Lomax cover. I am planning to install mine tomorrow. With all the information provided things should go smoothly. Removed the Honda cover today and raring to proceed in the morning. Thank you everyone!
 
Discussion starter · #17 ·
Thank you for all your input on the Lomax cover. I am planning to install mine tomorrow. With all the information provided things should go smoothly. Removed the Honda cover today and raring to proceed in the morning. Thank you everyone!

Let us know how it goes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Finally had time to complete the install of the Lomax cover. Easy to install. Got a buddy to assist though. It can be done with one person, but four eyes are better than one. I did not cover the drains near the back window or the side indentions. We had a storm last night and I received no water intrusion in the bed. I will keep an eye on it though. It looks good and doesn’t leak like the OEM cover. Will attach a picture later this week. I purchased the diamond plate cover. Thanks again for your help.
 
Discussion starter · #19 ·
Can’t wait to see the diamond plate version!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Following phineas excellent review, information and installation instructions, I installed my Lomax cover last week without help and without issues. To prevent leaking I used ZXMOTO Headlight Sealant (Butyl) to seal the channels at the front of the bed. I ran my RL though a car wash and got zero leakage.

BTW: I now have a Extang Trifecta 2.0 for sale in the Trading post section (perfect condition, just need more secure option for my truck bed).


 
1 - 20 of 117 Posts