Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums banner

Options for a "bigger" truck to replace my 2006 RTS

3.9K views 30 replies 14 participants last post by  kevin_stevens  
#1 ·
Let me start by saying that I love my ridgeline. I've had it for about 3 years and 50000 miles and it has never let me down, and taken me places I didn't think it could. That being said, I am starting to think I may need to replace it with something more off road capable, with a higher towing capacity, and I'm kind of at a loss as to which direction to look.

My son and I spend a lot of time riding and racing downhill mountain bikes, and we therefore also spend a lot of time driving up and down pretty rough and remote forestry and logging roads. For the most part the RL has handled them pretty well, but there are some we just can't manage. We were shuttling g one yesterday, and I could tell the truck was really being taxed. The transmission didn't sound or feel too happy at times, and the traction and clearance were on the edge as well. We also pull a small travel trailer around with us, as well as 4 heavy bikes and all our gear.

I feel that nothing will match the versatility of the ridgeline, but I don't want to destroy the truck either.

Does anyone has any experience with full size trucks, and can share some thoughts and advise? I was looking at used 2004-2006ish Toyota tundras or Nissan Titans, as I've never been a big fan of the offerings from "the big 3", but perhaps when it comes to trucks I should change my thinking.

Thanks in advance.
 
#3 · (Edited)
You have many decent full size trucks to choose from. Contrary to public opinion Chevy, Ford, even Dodge can do what you need done.

I'm looking for one of them in the 3/4 ton/full ton range, about 10 years of age, big gas or diesel, 150K -180K miles, and priced to make me happy. Specifically for higher towing weight limits.

ADDITIONAL WANTS: Two wheel drive and NOT jacked up (previous jacking has eliminated many otherwise fine choices for me). Your going off road would be completely opposite mine on these two items.

It won't be my daily driver but a workhorse.
 
#6 ·
I just check the Consumer Reports ratings. There is quite a contrast between the New ratings and Used ratings. Many new models (pretty much every manufacturer except GM is represented) get the Recommended mark. However, among used ones, there are only two make/models that get the "Good Bet" checkmark: The Ridgeline and the Tundra.
 
#7 ·
If it were me, I'd go with the EcoBoost F150. Great power, decent MPG's (comparable to your Ridgeline), WAY more capability in terms of towing, hauling, and off-roading. Do a search on youtube, there's a video on there where 2 guys compare a 2013 EcoBoost to a 2013 Ridgeline. It's pretty interesting.
 
#8 ·
I'll sell you my Jeep now that i put a skid plate on the RL--it's in Az tho!!
 
#9 ·
Get a Tundra.
 
#11 ·
Wait one month for the new 2014 Tundra
 
#12 ·
All good suggestions... The video was interesting as well, but really only addressed one aspect of the trucks.

I would love to be looking at new 2014 F150s or Tundras, but that isn't in the cards at this time. I'll be looking at their equivalents in a 5-7 year old truck. The F150 is definitely cheaper as a used option than a tundra or Titan. I just don't know if the Ford would be as reliable of durable.
 
#14 ·
FIX OR REPAIR DAILY! On a serious note though, my brother had three F-150's ranging from 1998-2010 and they all had tranny issues of some sort and the 2004 had engine problems.
 
#16 · (Edited)
Hogwash, I drove a 98 F150 for 15 dependable years. In that time it needed two new windshields, several sets of tires, one battery, multiple hub cap centers, one complete brake w/rotors and one partial, one blend door (my most expensive repair), four shocks and one alternator rebuild. Oil and filter every 3-5K, total miles about 180K.

I also had an extended 06 Ford E350 for 7 years/ 78K miles, other than oil, windshield wiper blades, 1 battery and 4 tires I spent nothing on it.

Granted they were not as refined as my numerous imports - but these Fords were just as reliable and I never regretted either buggy.
 
#21 ·
If you're doing a trailer anyway, might you go with an SUV instead? The problem with all the trucks is their wheelbase, especially on unimproved trails designed for bikes. Wheelbase hurts you almost as much as clearance.

Toyota put all of their quality LandCruiser hardware into the FJ, would that work for you?

KeS
 
#23 ·
I have thought of an SUV, and have been looking at 4Runners and Landcruisers as well. I'm still very hesitant to go to a full size truck, as it may be overkill for what my needs are, and I have a feeling I will miss the handling and nimbleness of the Ridgeline too much.

I just completed a 10 day trip with my son from Vancouver through the interior of BC to Golden. We pulled our trailer (1990 15' Wilderness, 1475kg GVRW) and although the RL struggled a bit on the bigger mountain passes, it did alright. I saw lots of BIG trucks pulling huge trailers and 5th wheels stopped on the side of the highway with their hoods up. I have no intention of going that route! Our little trailer serves us just fine for our needs.

But on some of the forestry roads we drove shuttling up to ride the trails down was where I was wishing for a little more power, and perhaps a more robust suspension. I'm starting to consider a 2005+ Toyota Tacoma as well, as far as trucks go. Not as big as a Tundra of FS truck, but more off road capable, and has a higher towing capacity.
 
#24 · (Edited)
An FJ will go more places than a Tacoma can, and you can get them with superchargers for better towing. A Tacoma isn't going to tow any better than a Ridgeline, or only marginally. I mentioned the SUV not only because of the wheelbase thing, but because it opens up more options: Xterras on the cheap side, and Grand Cherokees or that extended Wrangler model on the high end. I would encourage you to take a full-size truck on some of your downhill approach routes - I suspect you will find it really sucks.

Truthfully, I'd have to see the issues you're having with the RL. Adding a 2" lift solves a LOT of the approach and breakover problems, and should be enough until you run into actual "I NEED a low range" issues. I've spent hours in 100+ heat idling through trails out in the desert, and never had a twinge from the transmission or cooling issues at all - even when the hood was too hot to touch.

KeS
 
#29 ·
Truthfully, I'd have to see the issues you're having with the RL. Adding a 2" lift solves a LOT of the approach and breakover problems, and should be enough until you run into actual "I NEED a low range" issues. I've spent hours in 100+ heat idling through trails out in the desert, and never had a twinge from the transmission or cooling issues at all - even when the hood was too hot to touch.

KeS
I have started looking into a 2" lift, as well as some more aggresive tires (A/T 2s ?) as a way to keep my truck and improve its offroading capabilities. It has 145000 miles on it, and the original struts are starting to feel a little wallowy, so perhaps the combination of new struts, 2" lift and tires will inject some new life into it!

As I originally said, I really would rather not sell it, as I love the truck. Perhaps I am worrying needlessly about the transmission...it hasn't given me any grief, and I change at least 3 L of fluid with every oil change to try and keep it fresh. It doesn't get anywhere near that hot here!